From: dweller@universe.digex.net (David Weller)
Subject: Re: Ada to Buhr
Date: 1998/01/28
Date: 1998-01-28T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6ansnq$b50@universe.digex.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: JDEHHGAvDkz0EwRy@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk
In article <JDEHHGAvDkz0EwRy@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk>,
Martin M Dowie <martin@dowie-cs.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>Does anyone know of a reverse engineering tool to convert existing Ada
>(83) code into a Buhr notation diagram (approx 300 packages). we've
>tried the 'a_reveng' tool that comes with TeamWork (v7) but the result
>are not exactly readable...
>--
Hmm, some of us would claim that even IF a tool reverse-engineered
those 300 packages, the resulting Buhr notation would still be
unreadable :-)
Why would you want to convert 300 packages of old Adainto 300 diagrams
(generally) of an old notation? If you simply want to see
dependencies, there's a LOT of simple tools out there that will
provide you that info.
--
****** NEW!! DoD Ada Hotline Number: 1-800-PARIAH ******
Tired of "junk" e-mail? Write to your congressman and tell them you support
H.R. 1748, "The Netizens Protection Act of 1997". Make those SPAM-roaches run! http://www.cauce.org TAKE BACK THE INTERNET!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-01-28 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-01-27 0:00 Ada to Buhr Martin M Dowie
1998-01-28 0:00 ` David Weller [this message]
1998-01-28 0:00 ` Martin M Dowie
1998-01-28 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1998-02-18 0:00 ` Ed Colbert
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox