* if you ever complained about the signal/noise ratio
@ 1998-01-15 0:00 Pat Rogers
1998-01-16 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Pat Rogers @ 1998-01-15 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
If you've ever complained about the signal/noise ration on c.l.a, how about
looking at my posted question with subject reading "statically compatible
access discriminants in derivation"? It is pure signal... :)
pat rogers
progers@acm.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: if you ever complained about the signal/noise ratio
1998-01-15 0:00 if you ever complained about the signal/noise ratio Pat Rogers
@ 1998-01-16 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1998-01-16 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Nick Roberts @ 1998-01-16 0:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
I'm all noise, I guess... ;-)
--
Nick Roberts
Croydon, UK
Proprietor, ThoughtWing Software; Independent Software Development
Consultant
* Nick.Roberts@dial.pipex.com * Voicemail & Fax +44 181-405 1124 *
*** Eats three shredded spams every morning for breakfast ***
Pat Rogers <progers@acm.org> wrote in article
<69mc65$t5g$1@uuneo.neosoft.com>...
> If you've ever complained about the signal/noise ration on c.l.a, how
about
> looking at my posted question with subject reading "statically compatible
> access discriminants in derivation"? It is pure signal... :)
>
>
> pat rogers
> progers@acm.org
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1998-01-16 0:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1998-01-15 0:00 if you ever complained about the signal/noise ratio Pat Rogers
1998-01-16 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
1998-01-16 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox