* License issues
@ 2016-02-17 17:01 tonyg
2016-02-17 17:37 ` David Botton
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: tonyg @ 2016-02-17 17:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
Some one has just informed me on the openzwave page that the ada openzwave binding falls under the LGPL license. Originally I wanted to use the GMGPL.
Should I be crying?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: License issues
2016-02-17 17:01 License issues tonyg
@ 2016-02-17 17:37 ` David Botton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: David Botton @ 2016-02-17 17:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
On Wednesday, February 17, 2016 at 12:01:21 PM UTC-5, tonyg wrote:
> Some one has just informed me on the openzwave page that the ada openzwave binding falls under the LGPL license. Originally I wanted to use the GMGPL.
>
> Should I be crying?
Not really. Only if it was under GPL would you have a real concern.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-17 17:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-17 17:01 License issues tonyg
2016-02-17 17:37 ` David Botton
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox