From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: setting 'Size and unchecked conversion safe here?
Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:05:45 -0600
Date: 2005-02-12T12:05:45-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <676dna1FQuzk2JPfRVn-1Q@comcast.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.135.1108212272.527.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
> >> I need to store access-to-subprogram values in a 64-bit modular type.
> That's the container I have to store small values. It's in a database system
That database is not persistent from one program execution to the
next, surely. Is there any reason to believe an access to subprogram P in
one execution has the same 32 bit representation as an access to P in
another execution?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-12 18:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-11 18:52 setting 'Size and unchecked conversion safe here? Marius Amado Alves
2005-02-11 19:08 ` Martin Krischik
2005-02-11 20:34 ` tmoran
2005-02-11 22:37 ` Marius Amado Alves
2005-02-11 23:49 ` tmoran
2005-02-12 13:10 ` Marius Amado Alves
2005-02-12 6:55 ` Martin Krischik
2005-02-12 13:30 ` Marius Amado Alves
2005-02-12 14:57 ` Martin Krischik
2005-02-12 16:03 ` Marius Amado Alves
2005-02-12 16:04 ` Marius Amado Alves
2005-02-11 23:38 ` Robert A Duff
2005-02-12 12:46 ` Marius Amado Alves
2005-02-12 18:05 ` tmoran [this message]
2005-02-12 18:29 ` Marius Amado Alves
2005-02-12 19:14 ` Robert A Duff
2005-02-12 19:48 ` Marius Amado Alves
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox