From: marciant@earthlink.net
Subject: Re: GNAT: no visible subprogram matches the specification for "Put"
Date: Sun, 6 Oct 2019 04:45:20 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2019-10-06T04:45:20-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <665a8b5e-533e-4df6-a1c1-7a4c257ea277@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96d5218a-2714-40dd-988d-10c7d27a96a2@googlegroups.com>
I think that both are: both the one that can be passed a string and the one that
can be passed an integer. I thing that the "test signature" procedure at least
shows that the string one and the put_line one should be visible because it
runs as expected and the string one is the one that GNAT is complaining about.
I am thinking that GNAT's compilation - and my subsequent running - of the
Signature test program would imply that? Do you agree?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-06 11:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-04 18:53 GNAT: no visible subprogram matches the specification for "Put" Vincent Marciante
2019-10-05 10:50 ` Stephen Leake
2019-10-06 11:45 ` marciant [this message]
2019-10-07 11:55 ` vincent.marciante
2019-10-07 15:03 ` Stephen Leake
2019-10-07 19:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2019-10-07 19:01 ` briot.emmanuel
2019-10-08 10:01 ` Vincent Marciante
2019-10-08 14:53 ` Optikos
2019-10-08 17:48 ` Björn Lundin
2019-10-08 18:47 ` Vincent Marciante
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox