From: vo@ctron.com
Subject: Re: More like *p versus p[0]
Date: 1997/11/25
Date: 1997-11-25T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <65evej$cph$1@mer-news.ctron.com> (raw)
If you really have a problem with using *p
then you should use p[0]. Never, never
underestimate C 's expressiveness.
>
>Dennis Weldy wrote:
>
>
>> >Well, I was thinking of the use of * both for defining pointers and for
>> >dereferencing them.
>>
>> I've always thought htat made sense: the declaraction matches use.
>
>N, they don't; the order is different.
>
>> Or do you object to using [] for the declaration of arrays, and for indexing
>> into the array as well? ;-)
>
>No, because there it's consistent.
>
>
>--
>
> Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
> Senior Software SE
--
Huy Vo
Cabletron Systems, Inc
vo at ctron dot com
Nashua Facility
next reply other threads:[~1997-11-25 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-11-25 0:00 vo [this message]
1997-12-02 0:00 ` More like *p versus p[0] Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
[not found] ` <3486e4ff.2924140@news.thegrid.net>
1997-12-04 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-12-03 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-12-08 0:00 Marin David Condic, 561.796.8997, M/S 731-96
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox