From: rleif@rleif.com (Robert C. Leif)
Subject: Omission in the Ada Standard
Date: 25 Sep 2003 11:57:36 -0700
Date: 2003-09-25T18:57:37+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <657ea3e3.0309251057.7363a9d8@posting.google.com> (raw)
This should be Re: Omission in the Ada Standard. However, neither the
original nor Mr. Kilgallen's reply have appeared on the Google news
reader, which will not transmit with the Re:
Larry Kilgallen stated, "And what would the meaning be on some other
processor for which a standard-compliant Ada compiler is needed?"
If a CPU does NOT have ports, the part(s) of the compiler specific for
ports do not have to be implemented.
Bob Leif
Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
rleif@rleif.com
www.newportinstruments.com
next reply other threads:[~2003-09-25 18:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-09-25 18:57 Robert C. Leif [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-09-25 19:24 Omission in the Ada Standard Beard, Frank Randolph CIV
2003-09-26 0:30 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-09-26 16:10 ` Robert C. Leif
2003-09-26 17:38 ` Jeff C,
2003-09-28 21:43 ` Keith Thompson
2003-10-09 16:56 ` Jerry Petrey
2003-10-10 2:07 ` Jeff C,
2003-09-26 18:04 ` Jeff C,
2003-09-25 15:05 Robert C. Leif
2003-09-25 17:12 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-09-25 19:47 ` Simon Wright
2003-09-26 1:51 ` Jeff C,
2003-09-26 2:02 ` Larry Kilgallen
2003-09-26 13:05 ` Vinzent 'Gadget' Hoefler
2003-10-06 3:50 ` Dave Thompson
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox