Re: SPARK prooving an array of Positives.

[Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>]

On Tuesday, July 30, 2019 at 9:35:54 AM UTC-7, Shark8 wrote:
> I have a bit of a problem getting the SPARK provers to accept that a postcondition cannot fail. Given the following in a spec file:
> 
>     Type Axis_Count is range 0..999   with Size => 10;
>     Type Axis_Dimensions is Array (Axis_Count range <>) of Positive
>       with Default_Component_Value => 1;
>     Subtype Primary_Data_Array is Axis_Dimensions(1..999);
>     Subtype Random_Groups_Data is Axis_Dimensions(1..998);
> 
>     Function EF( Item : FITS.Axis_Dimensions ) return Interfaces.Unsigned_64;
> 
> and the following in the implementation:
> 
>     Function EF( Item : FITS.Axis_Dimensions ) return Interfaces.Unsigned_64 is
>         Max : Constant := Positive'Last;
>         Function First return Interfaces.Unsigned_64 is
>           ( Interfaces.Unsigned_64( Item( Item'First ) ) )
>           with Inline, Pre => Item'Length > 0, Post => First'Result <= Max;
>         Function Last return Interfaces.Unsigned_64 is
>             ( Interfaces.Unsigned_64( Item( Item'Last ) ) )
>           with Inline, Pre => Item'Length > 0, Post => Last'Result  <= Max;
>         use all type Interfaces.Unsigned_64;
>     Begin
> 	case Item'Length is
> 	   when 0      => return 1;
> 	   when 1      => return First;
> 	   when 2      => return First * Last;
> 	   when others =>
> 	    Declare
> 		Middle : Constant Axis_Count := Item'Length/2 + Item'First;
> 		Subtype Head is Axis_Count range Item'First..Middle;
> 		Subtype Tail is Axis_Count range Axis_Count'Succ(Middle)..Item'Last;
> 	    Begin
> 		Return EF(Item(Head)) * EF(Item(Tail));
> 	    End;
> 	end case;
>     End EF;
> 
> the SPARK prover is issuing warnings that the postconditions might fail.
> "medium: postcondition might fail, cannot prove First'Result <= Max (e.g. when First'Result = 0)"
> But this is impossible given that the element-type is Positive and the precondition states there is at least one element. Does anyone know why this is happening? (And how to fix it?)

Assuming you are using gnat-2019-community version, increase the level of proof by setting --level=n (n = 0 to 4) to see if it works.

Anh Vo