From: "Alex R. Mosteo" <devnull@mailinator.com>
Subject: Re: Announcement: GNAT ported to LLVM
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 18:25:16 +0100
Date: 2008-03-27T18:25:16+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6523k7F2dv208U1@mid.individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 04e55b5c-37b7-4dab-84e9-b548cb597a68@i12g2000prf.googlegroups.com
baldrick wrote:
>> I thought that -gnatN was even more aggressive than -gnatn.
>
> My understanding is that -gnatN was essentially a workaround for
> various historical limitations of the gcc inliner, most of which
> no longer exist. I've been told by ACT that -gnatN is deprecated
> on the x86. Personally I never bother with it.
Good to know.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-03-27 17:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-03-23 22:05 Announcement: GNAT ported to LLVM baldrick
2008-03-24 9:25 ` Samuel Tardieu
2008-03-24 18:09 ` baldrick
2008-03-27 0:41 ` Gene
2008-03-27 8:27 ` baldrick
2008-03-27 12:43 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2008-03-27 15:22 ` baldrick
2008-03-27 17:25 ` Alex R. Mosteo [this message]
2008-04-11 13:37 ` baldrick
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox