From: "Rego, P." <pvrego@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Best representation for spares
Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 08:26:28 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2014-02-16T08:26:28-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64d96ab9-ef9e-46b1-ac3b-3924766abaf6@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da3c94d8-b7eb-4390-a75e-291b9b3abe77@googlegroups.com>
On Sunday, February 16, 2014 10:40:11 AM UTC-3, Rego, P. wrote:
> I did not get. Is is better to use
> Auxiliary_Peripherals_Register_Map:
> Auxiliary_Peripherals_Register_Map_Type
> := (others => <>);
> or just initialize in system initialization?
> (or both?)
Now I guess RPi board talked to me :-)
I tried to use both approaches joint and separately, and in all initialization attempts from definition I got an
raised STORAGE_ERROR : stack overflow (or erroneous memory access)
which only was resolved when I removed both initializations kinds. So it seems to be safer to initialize the registers in run-time, inside a specific initialize procedure.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-16 16:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-14 1:07 Best representation for spares Rego, P.
2014-02-14 9:19 ` Simon Wright
2014-02-15 16:06 ` Rego, P.
2014-02-15 17:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-02-15 20:21 ` Rego, P.
2014-02-15 19:55 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-02-15 20:25 ` Rego, P.
2014-02-15 21:35 ` Rego, P.
2014-02-16 10:02 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-02-16 13:40 ` Rego, P.
2014-02-16 16:26 ` Rego, P. [this message]
2014-02-16 18:50 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-02-16 16:33 ` Niklas Holsti
2014-02-16 12:10 ` Simon Wright
2014-02-16 13:43 ` Rego, P.
2014-02-16 14:25 ` Robert A Duff
2014-02-16 16:21 ` Rego, P.
2014-02-15 21:41 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-02-15 22:37 ` Rego, P.
2014-02-15 22:41 ` Rego, P.
2014-02-16 0:39 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-02-16 12:06 ` Simon Wright
2014-02-16 13:45 ` Rego, P.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox