From: mfb@mbunix.mitre.org (Michael F Brenner)
Subject: Re: Use of constants on EFA
Date: 1997/11/11
Date: 1997-11-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <64ahc0$dk1@top.mitre.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 01bceece$4a6a85e0$423c63c3@default
That is very interesting, to classify the programming standards. Why
did you decide to do that? How can those standards be reviewed and
commented on by independent authority? How can you program economically
without public light? This is the first time I have seen a methodology
for coding given a security classification. Again, very interesting.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-11-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-11-05 0:00 Use of constants on EFA Kevin Wilson
1997-11-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-11-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-11-06 0:00 ` Peter Hermann
1997-11-06 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
[not found] ` <01bceece$4a6a85e0$423c63c3@default>
1997-11-11 0:00 ` Michael F Brenner [this message]
1997-11-12 0:00 ` Karel Th�nissen
1997-11-12 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough
[not found] ` <01bcefb3$a8ac9b80$a93163c3@default>
1997-11-17 0:00 ` Richard Toy
1997-11-17 0:00 ` KevinWilson
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1997-11-10 0:00 Tom Moran
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox