From: rlove@antispam.neosoft.com (Robert B. Love )
Subject: Re: IDE/Rational Apex experiences
Date: 1997/11/10
Date: 1997-11-10T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6460f3$k4g$1@uuneo.neosoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6429gb$5qh@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com
In <6429gb$5qh@dfw-ixnews12.ix.netcom.com> "bklungle" wrote:
> At a certain large AeroSpace company, use of Rational Apex was mandated
by
> management. There are 27 programmers trying to develop a very large
ground
> based processing system using C and C++. When 4 users log onto the
Rational
> Apex system, the response time on the network increases to around 20
> minutes. The system HAS been optimized about as much as the Gurus know
how.
While there are valid criticisms you can make about Apex this sounds like
your network is at fault. At my aerospace employer we have over 80
apex users. When the network works its a wonder, when it doesn't we get
the performance you describe. Note the key factor is the network and its
resources.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Love MIME & NeXT Mail OK
rlove@neosoft.com PGP key available
----------------------------------------------------------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-11-10 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-11-07 0:00 IDE/Rational Apex experiences Damian O'Neill
1997-11-08 0:00 ` bklungle
1997-11-08 0:00 ` Robert S. White
1997-11-10 0:00 ` bklungle
1997-11-11 0:00 ` Robert S. White
1997-11-10 0:00 ` Robert B. Love [this message]
1997-11-10 0:00 ` bklungle
1997-11-10 0:00 ` David Weller
1997-11-11 0:00 ` Gabriel Bereny
1997-11-12 0:00 ` bklungle
1997-11-12 0:00 ` KJPrice
1997-11-14 0:00 ` Don Harrison
1997-12-02 0:00 ` TB
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox