From: Rod Chapman <roderick.chapman@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: SPARK - runtime checks question
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2009 11:55:42 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-06-19T11:55:42-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <641a77b1-2f5d-477a-90be-325ff70bcb3b@q37g2000vbi.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7b7f62f6-7218-45c2-b4b6-a3becb8e5be0@w35g2000prg.googlegroups.com
On Jun 19, 7:29 pm, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> Ummm... only half right. If Natural'First is implementation-defined,
> you're working with a rather bizarre implementation.
Doh! I'll go straight to the back of the class then... :-)
- Rod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-19 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-19 15:26 SPARK - runtime checks question Maciej Sobczak
2009-06-19 15:31 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-06-19 16:04 ` Rod Chapman
2009-06-19 18:29 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-06-19 18:55 ` Rod Chapman [this message]
2009-06-19 21:38 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-06-19 18:33 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-06-19 21:16 ` Maciej Sobczak
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox