comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mdaly@gonzo.eta.com (Mike Daly)
Subject: Language Comparisons
Date: 8 Sep 88 15:11:47 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <630@nic.MR.NET> (raw)


We are in the middle of a (bi-annual) language "discussion" (religious
war).  I would like to consider using Ada for some new projects, but I
have not been able to find the kind of information I need to make a
good case for the language.

There seems to be little discussion that Ada is a very good choice of
implementation languages when it comes to the maintanence phase of the
software life cycle.

I am most interested in the implementation phase right now.  Can anyone
point me to some studies showing the comparative costs of implementing
software in Ada vs. other popular languages (Pascal, C, FORTRAN,
etc.)?  Is Ada 20% faster for implementation?  20% slower?  How about
design costs?

Thanks,
  Mike 
+++
Mike Daly               mdaly@gonzo.eta.com
ETA Systems Inc.        (612)642-3570
1450 Energy Park Drive
St. Paul, MN            

+++
Mike Daly
ETA Systems Inc.        mdaly@gonzo.eta.com
St. Paul, MN            Standard disclaimers apply.

                 reply	other threads:[~1988-09-08 15:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox