From: Martin Krischik <martin@krischik.com>
Subject: Re: task synchronization and activation
Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 11:47:03 +0100
Date: 2005-02-20T11:47:03+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6240403.AlpodYFlPf@linux1.krischik.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccekfc1fk0.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
Robert A Duff wrote:
> Martin Krischik <martin@krischik.com> writes:
> One possibility is that the original designers were thinking about the
> fact that exceptions that occur before the "begin" can't be handled.
> But I don't see why that makes any real difference.
AFAIK an exception happen before begin go back to the originator task. I at
least had lot's of fun with exeptions raised in one task and caught in
another.
Martin
--
mailto://krischik@users.sourceforge.net
Ada programming at: http://ada.krischik.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-02-20 10:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-02-19 15:11 task synchronization and activation Evangelista Sami
2005-02-19 16:11 ` Martin Krischik
2005-02-19 18:11 ` Ed Falis
2005-02-19 20:05 ` Robert A Duff
2005-02-20 10:47 ` Martin Krischik [this message]
2005-02-21 19:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2005-02-21 8:50 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2005-02-21 21:55 ` Robert A Duff
2005-02-22 0:01 ` Randy Brukardt
2005-02-22 7:17 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2005-02-23 2:24 ` Robert A Duff
2005-02-23 7:58 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox