comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jans@mako.UUCP (Jan Steinman)
Subject: Re: Thus spake the DoD...
Date: Tue, 5-Mar-85 11:55:10 EST	[thread overview]
Date: Tue Mar  5 11:55:10 1985
Message-ID: <623@mako.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 473@ssc-vax.UUCP

In article <473@ssc-vax.UUCP> tjj@ssc-vax.UUCP (T J Jardine) writes, quotes:
>> Mr. Shebs asks for one thing that Pascal or Ada do better...  (Elegance
>> isn't everything.  Profitability counts too.)
>>                        -- David Schachter
>>
> But seriously, folks, I have yet to see a profitable Ada program, and so has
> the DoD...
>
I really wish people wouldn't do this!  All right, TJ, do you work on DOD
projects?  Do you use Ada?  Do you have much (any) exposure to those who do?
There is so much emotional outpouring when it comes to pet languages, so much
of this empty "talking through one's hat".

FACT: A company in Rockwood, MD (Intellimac) delivered one of the earliest
Ada applications in late 1982.  I don't recall the particulars (and I really
hate to waste my employer's time looking up facts for people who are to lazy
to keep up with the news) but I believe it was nigh 100,000 lines of code.
This early, if not first, application (which was widely discussed in the
trade rags) was not for rockets, bombs, or submarines.  This Ada program runs
CAM, accounting, personnel, virtually everything for a German bus
manufacturer's automated factory in North Carolina!  It performs many tasks
normally asked of Lisp and COBOL.

SECOND FACT: The DOD does not see any *profitable* programs, including those
written in Lisp.  They are a profit *sink*, not *source*.  As to whether they
find Ada a useful means to their various ends, years of defense industry work
prior to coming to Tek qualifies me to say "Yes".  Most of Ada's DOD use is
classified and doesn't show up in the National Enquirer, although it's
presence is well documented in the major DOD trade rags.

> Sorry for the length, but I got stuck on my soap box again!
>
Before you get up on your soapbox and do some more uninformed spouting off,
call Ralph Crafts (VP Marketing, Intellimac) 301/984-8000.

I don't have anything in general against Lisp, Pascal, or any other language.
I do take dim view of those who have a chip on their shoulder over make up
fairy tales to support their stand!
-- 
:::::: Jan Steinman		Box 1000, MS 61-161	(w)503/685-2843 ::::::
:::::: tektronix!tekecs!jans	Wilsonville, OR 97070	(h)503/657-7703 ::::::

  reply	other threads:[~1985-03-05 16:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1985-02-14 15:59 Thus spake the DoD Frederick J Dickey
1985-02-17  1:58 ` Robert Hofkin
1985-02-17 16:36 ` g-frank
1985-02-18  5:18   ` Skef Wholey
1985-02-18 14:33 ` Chuck Hedrick
1985-02-19 19:09   ` Daniel J. Salomon
1985-02-22  2:21     ` LISP &c (re: the DoD...) Thomas M. Breuel
1985-02-25 17:08     ` Thus spake the DoD Jan Steinman
1985-02-26 23:20     ` Stanley Shebs
1985-02-27 19:22       ` Daniel J. Salomon
1985-03-01 19:30         ` Stanley Shebs
1985-03-01 20:13         ` neves
1985-03-02  4:33         ` Thomas M. Breuel
1985-03-02 18:35           ` Efficiency of LISP Marty Sasaki
1985-03-03  0:23         ` Language criticism Greg Davidson
1985-03-06 14:13         ` Thus spake the DoD geb
1985-02-28  3:16       ` David Schachter
1985-03-01 19:00         ` Stanley Shebs
1985-03-03  3:08         ` Joaquim Martillo
1985-03-03  6:12         ` T J Jardine
1985-03-05 16:55           ` Jan Steinman [this message]
1985-03-05 21:07           ` Robert A. Pease
1985-03-12  1:47           ` Ed Colbert
1985-03-13 19:35       ` Monique M Taylor
1985-03-17 19:49         ` Jan Steinman
1985-03-21  1:17           ` faustus
1985-03-12  0:25     ` Efficiency of LISP Stavros Macrakis
1985-03-12  2:11     ` Efficiency of numerical Lisp code (details) Stavros Macrakis
1985-03-13  7:05     ` Chuck Hedrick
1985-03-13 20:00     ` Speed with numbers: PDP-10 Maclisp vs. Fortran (details) Stavros Macrakis
1985-03-14 10:12       ` Tim Maroney
1985-03-15  0:27         ` Bill Henneman
1985-03-16  0:59           ` Tim Maroney
1985-03-17 18:58             ` Bill Henneman
1985-03-18  5:02               ` Multi-language systems Marty Sasaki
1985-03-20 17:01                 ` Tom Slack
1985-03-18 21:24               ` Speed with numbers: PDP-10 Maclisp vs. Fortran (details) Tim Maroney
1985-03-19  6:45                 ` Fortran better than Lisp for numerical code? Barry Margolin
1985-03-19 17:35                   ` Speed of Lisp numerical code Stavros Macrakis
1985-03-20 21:04                   ` Fortran better than Lisp for numerical code? T J Jardine
1985-03-22  2:10                     ` Joe Orost
1985-03-19 16:15                 ` Speed with numbers: PDP-10 Maclisp vs. Fortran (details) Bill Henneman
1985-03-19  3:40               ` Norman Diamond
1985-03-18  3:01             ` Common Lisp and Arrays Joaquim Martillo
1985-02-18 23:49 ` Thus spake the DoD M.Fischer
1985-03-14 20:50 ` Speed with numbers: PDP-10 Maclisp vs. Fortran (details) Stavros Macrakis
1985-03-15 15:42 ` Stanley Shebs
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1985-02-15 14:34 Thus spake the DoD Frederick J Dickey
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox