From: Joel VanLaven <jvl@ocsystems.com>
Subject: Re: QUIZ: To be or not to be (able to post)
Date: 1997/10/02
Date: 1997-10-02T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6114h5$pmk@news3.his.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EHG0r1.K47.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com
Tucker Taft <stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com> wrote:
: Actually, they *are* subtype conformant, but they are not *fully* conformant
: because of the formal parameter name change from F to X. I bet your
: compiler knew that already ;-).
Sure enough, I goofed. I tried compiling it with the X changed to an F and
it worked so our compiler must have "known that". I am just a little
surprised that the "obvious" big difference (between float and float'base)
wasn't really a difference at all.
Thanks for the catch.
-- Joel VanLaven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-10-02 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-09-29 0:00 QUIZ: To be or not to be (able to post) Geert Bosch
1997-09-30 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-09-30 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-10-02 0:00 ` Joel VanLaven
1997-10-02 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-10-02 0:00 ` Joel VanLaven [this message]
1997-10-03 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox