comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kenner@lab.ultra.nyu.edu (Richard Kenner)
Subject: Re: GNAT extensions, recompilation (was Re: what DOES the GPL...)
Date: 1997/08/25
Date: 1997-08-25T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5tql89$b90$1@news.nyu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5tp162$rg9$1@trumpet.uni-mannheim.de


In article <5tp162$rg9$1@trumpet.uni-mannheim.de> mw@ipx2.rz.uni-mannheim.de (Marc Wachowitz) writes:
>Robert Dewar wrote:
>> Actually it would be very nice if there was more experimental activity
>> with GNAT in terms of interesting new experimental ideas, but so far
>> we haven't seen much of this -- hopefully we will see more in the future,
>> this is after all why the sources are available
>
>If my memory doesn't fool me, and I didn't misunderstand what you meant,
>you've recently stated (here or on chat) that you wouldn't consider the
>ability of non-customers to recompile the public releases very important,
>since you'd expect people to use the binary releases.
>
>Above you've already mentioned one yourself: Unless everyone trying to extend
>(or in some other way experiment with the internals of) GNAT is a customer,
>there should be a reasonable confidence that one will be able to re-apply
>one's modifications to further releases (obviously, with changes necessary
>for the new release). 

Right, but the point is that anybody with enough knowlege to usefully
do work in experimenting with GNAT extensions will have had to have
formed enough knowlege to know how to properly compile it, which, as
you know, is only a straighforward process if you understand what's
going on.

>Another reason is that there may be patches to GCC which one considers very
>important for one's platform, and which one therefore wants to be part of the
>GNAT version one is using, without depending on updates from whoever provides
>the binary releases.

This is actually a good reason *not* to support the building of GNAT
from sources since there is no assurance that those "important patches
to GCC" will work properly with GNAT.  There are quite a number of
patch sets to GCC out there.  Some will work with GNAT and some will
likely not, but there is nobody who reliably knows which are in which
category.  Somebody who tries something like this is most assuredly on
their own!




       reply	other threads:[~1997-08-25  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <5tp162$rg9$1@trumpet.uni-mannheim.de>
1997-08-25  0:00 ` Richard Kenner [this message]
     [not found] ` <dewar.872443148@merv>
1997-08-29  0:00   ` GNAT extensions, recompilation (was Re: what DOES the GPL...) Ronald Cole
1997-09-11  0:00     ` Joerg Rodemann
1997-08-25  0:00 Marc Wachowitz
1997-08-25  0:00 ` Richard Kenner
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox