From: Jean-Pierre Rosen <rosen@adalog.fr>
Subject: Re: seperate compilation for protected objects
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2005 15:44:37 +0200
Date: 2005-03-31T15:44:37+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5sug2d.qmp.ln@hunter.axlog.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1112270905.678889.118410@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com>
Andrew a �crit :
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to do seperate compilation with a protected object.
>
> I have something similar to the following:
>
> === file tasks.ads ===
> package Tasks is
>
> protected type Boob is
> . . .
> end Boob;
> end Tasks;
>
> === file tasks.adb ===
> package body Tasks is
> <blah>
> protected body Boob is seperate;
> end Tasks;
>
> I am using Gnat3.15p on FreeBSD Unix.
> I get similar compilation messages to the below:
> tasks.adb:<#>:<#>: all components must be declared in spec
> ...
>
A wild guess, since you didn't show the body:
Didn't you declare components in the body? i.e.
protected body Boob is
X : integer; -- Not allowed
....
end Boob;
Remember that a protected object is actually more like a record than a
package; it has no variables, only components (like record components),
and they are not allowed in the body.
Presumably, this has nothing to do with separate compilation...
--
---------------------------------------------------------
J-P. Rosen (rosen@adalog.fr)
Visit Adalog's web site at http://www.adalog.fr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-03-31 13:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-03-31 12:08 seperate compilation for protected objects Andrew
2005-03-31 12:15 ` Peter Hermann
2005-03-31 12:20 ` Andrew
2005-03-31 12:22 ` Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2005-03-31 12:29 ` Andrew
2005-03-31 13:44 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen [this message]
2005-04-01 8:25 ` Andrew
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox