From: cgreen@yosemite.atc.com (Christopher Green)
Subject: Re: Placement of pragma Convention
Date: 1997/06/23
Date: 1997-06-23T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5omp0v$pj@newshub.atmnet.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: EC8x58.2uJ.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com
In article <EC8x58.2uJ.0.-s@inmet.camb.inmet.com>,
Tucker Taft <stt@houdini.camb.inmet.com> wrote:
>Despite my affiliation, GNAT is in the right on this one.
>A program unit pragma may follow the program unit only if the
>program unit is a subprogram_declaration, generic_subprogram_declaration,
>or generic instantiation (10.1.5(4,6)). In all other cases, it needs to be
>immediately inside the program unit. Although a "subprogram_body"
>is considered to be a "declaration," it is *not* within the category
>"subprogram_declaration," and so any program unit pragma must
>be immediately inside it, rather than following it.
Thank you, Tucker, for your clear and complete explanation.
I see the point; however, the distinction between a declaration
of a subprogram and a subprogram_declaration seems to me a fine
one.
Chris Green Email cgreen@atc.com
Advanced Technology Center Phone (714) 583-9119
22982 Mill Creek Drive ext. 220
Laguna Hills, CA 92653 Fax (714) 583-9213
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-06-23 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-06-20 0:00 Placement of pragma Convention Christopher Green
1997-06-23 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1997-06-23 0:00 ` Christopher Green [this message]
1997-06-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox