From: Dale Stanbrough <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.EDU.AU>
Subject: Re: Private declaration question
Date: 1997/06/10
Date: 1997-06-10T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5nibkg$p9t$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 865912531.32snx@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl
Jerry van Dijk writes:
"Why has the completion of a private declaration to be a full view ?
1. package Oops is
2.
3. type A_Type is limited private;
4.
5. private
6.
7. type A_Type is array (Positive range <>) of Integer;
|
>>> full view of type must be definite subtype"
think what would happen if someone declared...
type stuff is array (1..10) of A_Type;
Arrays can only be declared using definite (i.e. fixed size) types.
Try
type A_Type (<>) is limited private;
Dale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-06-10 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-06-10 0:00 Private declaration question Jerry van Dijk
1997-06-10 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1997-06-10 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
1997-06-10 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough [this message]
1997-06-11 0:00 ` Jerry van Dijk
1997-06-10 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1997-06-10 0:00 ` John G. Volan
1997-06-10 0:00 ` Anonymous
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox