From: gelleric@kafka.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de (Wolfgang Gellerich)
Subject: Re: GOTO considered necessary
Date: 1997/06/09
Date: 1997-06-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ngok1$gdt@zdi.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5n977i$2cmc$1@prime.imagin.net
In article <5n977i$2cmc$1@prime.imagin.net>, smize@news.imagin.net (Samuel Mize) writes:
|>
|> I'm rebeating a dead horse, in order to write up a consensus paper to
|> submit to adahome. I'll appreciate your input.
|>
|> This one concerns use of "goto" statements.
|>
Last year, we made a study about today's usage of GOTO statements, comparing
Ada, C, and Fortran and also giving a short summary of the GOTO discussion.
That paper is available in postscript (data about citation etc appended on
the last page). The www address is:
http://www.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/ifi/ps/Gellerich/publications.html
---
Wolfgang Gellerich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-06-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-06-06 0:00 GOTO considered necessary Samuel Mize
1997-06-06 0:00 ` Michel Gauthier
1997-06-07 0:00 ` Michael F Brenner
1997-06-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-06-17 0:00 ` GOTO considered necessary (FSAs) Nick Roberts
1997-06-07 0:00 ` GOTO considered necessary Robert Dewar
1997-06-17 0:00 ` Woodrow Yeung
1997-06-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-07-09 0:00 ` Woodrow Yeung
1997-06-23 0:00 ` Adam Beneschan
1997-06-09 0:00 ` Wolfgang Gellerich [this message]
1997-06-09 0:00 ` Anonymous
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox