From: scott@tcville.es.hac.com
Subject: Re: Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?!
Date: 1997/05/29
Date: 1997-05-29T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5mkcgj$gi2@hacgate2.hac.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5m204l$1b60$1@prime.imagin.net
In article 1@prime.imagin.net, smize@news.imagin.net (Samuel Mize) writes:
>In article <wnsozgefto.fsf@ms31.sp.trw.com>,
>Rick Flower <flower@ms31.sp.trw.com> wrote:
>>
>>Anyone else heard this from the horses mouth? Sounds pretty pathetic
>>to me! At this rate, they won't last too long as an Ada vendor!
>
>Do they have a big base of existing customers for Ada 83, who would
>pay for Ada 83 support? I would expect new customers to want Ada 95.
Probably is a function of the project-phase the user-base is in.
I know that we'd love to go to Ada95 [and we are using the GH tool
suite] but this, for various reasons, isn't possible due to how
commited we are to the target-OS, Host-platform, etc..
Scott
---
Hughes Aircraft Co./Raytheon/whatever/? voice: (310) 616-1059
Sensors and Communications Systems Segment
PO Box 902, EO/E01/A172, El Segundo, Ca. 90245
prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-05-29 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-05-21 0:00 Greenhills Drops Ada-83 Support?! Rick Flower
1997-05-22 0:00 ` Jeff Creem
1997-05-22 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1997-05-29 0:00 ` scott [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox