From: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de>
Subject: Re: Ada Networking (General/Design)
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 12:14:01 +0200
Date: 2012-08-14T12:14:01+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5i0visgzog1.6g1g6fnuefla$.dlg@40tude.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: k0bo2a$ebg$1@speranza.aioe.org
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:28:58 +0000 (UTC), tmoran@acm.org wrote:
>> For non-blocking I/O there should be a way to have a pseudo-task ran by the
>> events on the socket, rather than scheduled.
> That's what overidable procedures When_Connect, When_Readable,
> When_Disconnect, etc are for. They are called when the event occurs.
No, that is upside-down. The point is to write I/O code as if it were
synchronous and half-duplex:
send
receive
process
send
...
Compare it with Ada task. You write a task as if it didn't share the
processor, you don't hook at timer interrupts.
--
Regards,
Dmitry A. Kazakov
http://www.dmitry-kazakov.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-17 21:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-08-12 20:26 Ada Networking (General/Design) Shark8
2012-08-12 23:05 ` Shark8
2012-08-13 0:10 ` sbelmont700
2012-08-13 0:25 ` Shark8
2012-08-13 7:11 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-08-13 12:33 ` Patrick
2012-08-13 13:11 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-08-13 13:12 ` Marc C
2012-08-13 13:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-08-13 15:51 ` tmoran
2012-08-13 16:19 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-08-13 16:30 ` Patrick
2012-08-13 16:53 ` Patrick
2012-08-13 18:18 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-08-13 20:36 ` anon
2012-08-14 5:40 ` Patrick
2012-08-13 19:11 ` tmoran
2012-08-13 20:03 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-08-13 20:28 ` tmoran
2012-08-14 10:14 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov [this message]
2012-08-14 17:57 ` tmoran
2012-08-13 17:54 ` Marc C
2012-08-13 18:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-08-13 18:59 ` Marc C
2012-08-13 19:16 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-08-14 8:39 ` Maciej Sobczak
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox