From: dcurry@ponder.csci.unt.edu (David Curry)
Subject: GNAT 3.07 v. GNAT 3.09
Date: 1997/04/01
Date: 1997-04-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5hs1t2$ehl@hermes.acs.unt.edu> (raw)
Being new to Ada, I downloaded the GNAT 3.09 binaries for Linux and tried
to compile TASH 7.6. On almost every body file, the compiler exited with
a message regarding an internal bug in GNAT. However, it did compile
everything in its distribution (dining philosophers, etc.). I then
download GNAT 3.07 and TASH 7.6 compiled clean. Is 3.07 generally more
stable than 3.09 or is this problem caused be something else?
________________________________________________________________________
_||_ ____
For every complex problem, there is a -||- /o \/
solution that is simple, neat, and wrong. || David Curry \____/\
-- H. L. Mencken || dcurry@ponder.csci.unt.edu
________________________________________________________________________
next reply other threads:[~1997-04-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-04-01 0:00 David Curry [this message]
1997-04-01 0:00 ` GNAT 3.07 v. GNAT 3.09 Robert Dewar
1997-04-08 0:00 ` TASH 7.6 v. GNAT 3.09 (was GNAT 3.07 v. GNAT 3.09) Ronald K. House
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox