From: Dale Stanbrough <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Packed array size question....
Date: 1997/03/19
Date: 1997-03-19T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5gnj47$pe8$1@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.858568318@merv
Robert Dewar writes:
"Better is O'Size / Storage_Unit -- makes it clearer what is going on, and
indeed to be absolutely right, you should write
(O'Size + (Storage_Unit - 1)) / Storage_Unit
which is an annoying mouthful, and i agree that an attribute would be nice.
We considered adding it to GNAT, but it would seem to create confusion,
given the Value_Size vs Object_Size issue."
Object'Storage_Unit_Size
Object'Size_In_Storage_Units
?
Dale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-03-19 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-03-07 0:00 Packed array size question Marc Bejerano
1997-03-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-03-13 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
[not found] ` <01bc300c$247f6200$0e096dce@my-pc.neosoft.com>
1997-03-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-03-16 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1997-03-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-03-19 0:00 ` Dale Stanbrough [this message]
1997-03-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox