From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GCC 3.1 released
Date: 18 May 2002 22:53:22 -0700
Date: 2002-05-19T05:53:22+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205182153.96015a@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a9BF8.31646$sg2.8197256@typhoon.ne.ipsvc.net
"Jeffrey Creem" <jeff@thecreems.com> wrote in message news:<a9BF8.31646$sg2.8197256@typhoon.ne.ipsvc.net>...
> P.S. I am sure I said something above that conflicts with
> my first statement about not arguing with Robert about
> GNAT
In fact everything you said makes perfect sense. No one
is saying the GNAT in 3.1 will fail on all programs, just that it does
not meet our QA criteria yet and we know of
too many programs on which it does fail.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-19 5:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-16 12:42 GCC 3.1 released Steve Sangwine
2002-05-16 13:08 ` chris.danx
2002-05-16 22:08 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-18 2:59 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2002-05-18 9:22 ` Adrian Knoth
2002-05-18 12:25 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2002-05-18 14:16 ` Jeffrey Creem
2002-05-18 14:56 ` Adrian Knoth
2002-05-18 20:20 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-18 21:26 ` Simon Wright
2002-05-18 23:07 ` Jeffrey Creem
2002-05-19 5:53 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2002-05-19 9:21 ` Jerry van Dijk
2002-05-20 16:30 ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-20 13:35 ` John R. Strohm
2002-05-20 18:52 ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-20 23:22 ` Jeffrey Creem
2002-05-21 0:02 ` Jeffrey Creem
2002-05-21 19:10 ` Ted Dennison
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox