From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Where is the GNAT source code
Date: 8 May 2002 19:34:25 -0700
Date: 2002-05-09T02:34:26+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205081834.2617e7f6@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: x7voffqwjhk.fsf@pushface.org
Simon Wright <simon@pushface.org> wrote in message news:<x7voffqwjhk.fsf@pushface.org>...
> dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:
>
> But I can report that the Booch Components built without > regressions against gcc version 3.1 20020505
> (prerelease), i686-pc-linux-gnu. Very pleasing, if only a
> tiny datum.
Don't get me wrong, a *lot* works in this 3.1 version of
GNAT. Our test suite is pretty rigorous at this stage, and
failing a couple of dozen tests in this suite definitely
does not mean that this version of GNAT is unusable, especially for
hobbyist and student use, and by all means
grab it and play with it :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-09 2:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-07 23:09 Where is the GNAT source code Jason LaPenta
2002-05-08 4:39 ` Per Sandbergs
2002-05-08 13:05 ` Robert Dewar
2002-05-08 19:02 ` Simon Wright
2002-05-09 2:34 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2002-05-09 13:38 ` Ted Dennison
2002-05-09 18:06 ` Craig Carey
2002-05-08 9:11 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox