From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Static expression question
Date: 7 May 2002 03:45:49 -0700
Date: 2002-05-07T10:45:49+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0205070245.1e70bd51@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3CD710A0.4743@earthlink.net
Vincent Marciante <marciant_remove@earthlink.net> wrote in message news:<3CD710A0.4743@earthlink.net>...
> Isn't the renaming of an enumeration literal as a function
> supposed to be considered to be a static expression?
My initial answer to this was no, but I agree that Vincent's exegesis
looks reasonable (leading to an answer of yes). This is certainly a
very delicate area of the language (what denotes what, and what is
static), and not one where I consider myself to be expert enough.
Hopefully we can get a reading here from Tuck, I will also ask
Gary Dismukes.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-05-07 10:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-05-06 23:24 Static expression question Vincent Marciante
2002-05-07 10:45 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2002-05-08 3:15 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox