From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar
Date: 27 Apr 2002 17:00:57 -0700
Date: 2002-04-28T00:00:57+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0204271600.39412ef9@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: yecbsc5gh7m.fsf@king.cts.com
Keith Thompson <kst@cts.com> wrote in message news:<yecbsc5gh7m.fsf@king.cts.com>...
Keith's message made me curious as to what KPD had actually said, so I
temporarily unkilled to read it.
I must say I am a bit at a loss. As far as I can tell KPD thinks
it is unethical of me to refuse to read his posts. That seems a bit
odd. I prefer to keep him in my kill file, because I don't like
having to worry about suppressing groups in responses. That's all
there is to it.
Very curious :-)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-28 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-23 3:11 The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 3:43 ` Jim Rogers
2002-04-23 6:02 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 12:33 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-23 3:51 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Kent Paul Dolan Larry Kilgallen
2002-04-23 6:05 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 10:21 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-05-01 12:59 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-23 3:54 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Eric G. Miller
2002-04-23 6:12 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 6:20 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 11:48 ` chris.danx
2002-04-23 13:08 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2002-04-23 16:36 ` The inscrutable ethics of KPD and RC Wes Groleau
2002-04-27 17:54 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Keith Thompson
2002-04-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox