From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar
Date: 23 Apr 2002 05:33:32 -0700
Date: 2002-04-23T12:33:33+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0204230433.1f651d6c@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3CC4D85D.9080108@worldnet.att.net
Jim Rogers <jimmaureenrogers@worldnet.att.net> wrote in message news:<3CC4D85D.9080108@worldnet.att.net>...
Hmm! I did not see the KPD posting that started this thread, since he
is in my kill file. I gather that upsets him, but he should not be
so upset. I have only limited time to spend reading CLA, and I find
it helps if I am a bit selective in reading posts :-)
And now I am afraid that this whole thread gets added to the kill
file (I routinely kill entire threads in CLA, I find only a few
to be of interest. I hope people don't find this "slimey", it's
just that I have a lot of pressure on my time :-) :-)
Robert Dewar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-23 12:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-23 3:11 The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 3:43 ` Jim Rogers
2002-04-23 6:02 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 12:33 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2002-04-23 3:51 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Kent Paul Dolan Larry Kilgallen
2002-04-23 6:05 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 10:21 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-05-01 12:59 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-23 3:54 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Eric G. Miller
2002-04-23 6:12 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 6:20 ` Kent Paul Dolan
2002-04-23 11:48 ` chris.danx
2002-04-23 13:08 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2002-04-23 16:36 ` The inscrutable ethics of KPD and RC Wes Groleau
2002-04-27 17:54 ` The incredibly slimy ethics of Robert Dewar Keith Thompson
2002-04-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox