From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Missing **-operator in GNAT 3.14?
Date: 2 Apr 2002 17:02:10 -0800
Date: 2002-04-03T01:02:11+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0204021702.bb04357@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: a8con5$2emm$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz
"Sergey Koshcheyev" <serko84@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:<a8con5$2emm$1@ns.felk.cvut.cz>...
> So the second operand of "**" has to be of type Natural,
> regardless of the type of the first operand.
Good going Sergey, I was wondering when someone might
actually look up the declaration of "**". After all the
diagnostic said that no matching "**" was declared, you
would think the first reaction would be to go look at the
declared "**" and see why it does not match :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-03 1:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-02 8:56 Missing **-operator in GNAT 3.14? Anders Råberg
2002-04-02 11:14 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2002-04-02 16:18 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-02 16:42 ` David C. Hoos
2002-04-02 17:11 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-04-03 1:02 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2002-04-03 3:51 ` Steve Doiel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-02 17:07 Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox