From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Missing **-operator in GNAT 3.14?
Date: 2 Apr 2002 08:18:19 -0800
Date: 2002-04-02T16:18:20+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0204020818.1c6d9799@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.1017746102.31836.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
"David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com> wrote in message news:<mailman.1017746102.31836.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>...
> The fact that "*", and "**" are treated differently by
> GNAT looks like a "bug" to me, though, and you should
> probably report it to report@gnat.com
Nothing to report here, the diagnostic is correct! If
some earlier version of GNAT accepted this, it was a bug
in that earlier version, since the code is wrong.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-04-02 16:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-04-02 8:56 Missing **-operator in GNAT 3.14? Anders Råberg
2002-04-02 11:14 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2002-04-02 16:18 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2002-04-02 16:42 ` David C. Hoos
2002-04-02 17:11 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-04-03 1:02 ` Robert Dewar
2002-04-03 3:51 ` Steve Doiel
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-04-02 17:07 Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox