From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: How to catch NaNs with gnat3.14p
Date: 1 Feb 2002 22:23:47 -0800
Date: 2002-02-02T06:23:47+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0202012223.4b3573a0@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: A5z68.65994$Ln2.14407993@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net
"Jeffrey Creem" <jeff@thecreems.com> wrote in message news:<A5z68.65994$Ln2.14407993@typhoon.ne.mediaone.net>...
> Umm..Read manual againto be sure..I think you are still missing stack checks
> without
> -fstack-check
Yes, and also if you want dynamic elaboration checks RM
style, you need -gnatE, but don't use -gnatE unless you
understand what you are doing. For most users the default
static elaboration checking is safer.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-02-02 6:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-02-01 13:49 How to catch NaNs with gnat3.14p Alexander Boucke
2002-02-01 14:18 ` Preben Randhol
2002-02-01 14:37 ` Alexander Boucke
2002-02-01 14:55 ` Preben Randhol
2002-02-01 14:59 ` Alexander Boucke
2002-02-01 15:30 ` Preben Randhol
2002-02-01 16:10 ` Alexander Boucke
2002-02-01 16:10 ` Jeffrey Creem
2002-02-02 6:23 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2002-02-02 6:21 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-04 8:57 ` Alexander Boucke
2002-02-02 6:20 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-02 12:49 ` Preben Randhol
2002-02-02 22:56 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-01 20:22 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-03 13:27 ` Marc A. Criley
2002-02-03 23:06 ` Robert Dewar
2002-02-04 13:05 ` Marc A. Criley
2002-02-05 1:06 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox