From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Next public release of GNAT(?)
Date: 9 Jan 2002 17:49:57 -0800
Date: 2002-01-10T01:49:57+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0201091749.474481be@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3c3c7eba$0$3190$626a54ce@news.free.fr
Jean-Marc Bourguet <jm@bourguet.org> wrote in message news:<3c3c7eba$0$3190$626a54ce@news.free.fr>...
> The gcc team obviously (but I don't think that gcc team
> will release the ada part without an agrement of Robert
> Dewar
It's not just me, several people share the role of fsf maintainer of GNAT.
> and from what I get the status about ada in 3.1 is "will
> be present if it is in a acceptable state
Right, so the question is what is acceptable, and we are
discussing that
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-10 1:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-09 7:58 Next public release of GNAT(?) Frank
2002-01-09 9:11 ` Gerhard Häring
2002-01-09 9:25 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2002-01-09 16:19 ` Stephen Leake
2002-01-09 17:32 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2002-01-10 1:49 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2002-01-09 18:30 ` Mark Johnson
2002-01-10 1:54 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-09 19:32 ` Florian Weimer
2002-01-09 20:22 ` Stephen Leake
2002-01-10 1:56 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-15 14:50 ` Dale Pontius
2002-01-15 17:09 ` Preben Randhol
2002-01-15 17:17 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2002-01-15 20:33 ` Florian Weimer
2002-01-15 21:08 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-10 1:47 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-10 1:44 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-09 16:16 ` Stephen Leake
2002-01-10 2:03 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-10 7:27 ` Britt Snodgrass
2002-01-12 10:31 ` Frank
2002-01-15 3:55 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-10 1:42 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-11 11:59 ` Larry Kilgallen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox