From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: FYI: GNAT and GCC
Date: 4 Oct 2001 04:38:44 -0700
Date: 2001-10-04T11:38:45+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0110040338.4ebe6529@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrn9rn5tj.uu.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no
Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message news:<slrn9rn5tj.uu.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no>...
> No, but it will probably be easier to install as it is just to add the
> gcc-gnat DEB, RPM, SLP etc. package to the installation.
Yes, although of course unlike the other gcc front ends,
to install from sources requires that you go and fetch
at least a gnat1 starter executable from somewhere. That's
not significantly less work than installing a complete
GNAT in the first place.
I just don't want people to get the wrong impression here.
I think a fair analogy is the extent to which chill got
picked up as part of typical gcc installs.
Robert Dewar
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-04 11:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 13:40 FYI: GNAT and GCC Florian Weimer
2001-10-02 14:14 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-10-02 18:22 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-03 4:04 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-02 19:24 ` mike
2001-10-02 20:10 ` 3-13p or 3-14a1 Frank
2001-10-02 21:10 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-02 21:26 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-03 4:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-03 7:00 ` Frank
2001-10-03 4:42 ` FYI: GNAT and GCC Ian S. Nelson
2001-10-03 16:12 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-03 20:52 ` Preben Randhol
2001-10-04 11:38 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2001-10-04 12:46 ` Florian Weimer
2001-10-04 2:53 ` Ian S. Nelson
2001-10-05 13:42 ` Dale Pontius
2001-10-08 15:19 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-10-09 17:30 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-09 18:48 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox