From: dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: GNAT/GCC 3.0?
Date: 10 Aug 2001 03:42:32 -0700
Date: 2001-08-10T10:42:32+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ee5b646.0108100242.1cc6cc44@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 6BbNZYxtKoM8@eisner.encompasserve.org
Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) wrote in message news:<6BbNZYxtKoM8@eisner.encompasserve.org>...
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.33.0108091330420.130-100000@2067.resnet.uni.edu>, <lange92@2067.resnet.uni.edu> writes:
> > A while back I read something about GCC including gnat in the main gcc
> > tree. Has anyone heard about the plans to include it in gcc recently?
>
> Yes, I have read about it in this newsgroup within the past two weeks.
> I don't remember the details, but you could check an archive.
This is still in the works, and we hope to see something happen in
the next couple of weeks (probably realistically at the start of
September at this stage).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-10 10:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-09 18:37 GNAT/GCC 3.0? lange92
2001-08-10 2:19 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-08-10 10:42 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2001-08-10 11:15 ` nicolas
2001-08-10 12:50 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox