From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Stackoverflow answer in need of update?
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2015 05:14:06 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2015-02-25T05:14:06-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ed1d53a-de95-4fc3-8d03-85ebfa3d4e58@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <mcifuj$dq8$1@dont-email.me>
Am Dienstag, 24. Februar 2015 19:31:52 UTC+1 schrieb J-P. Rosen:
...
> Program units yes, but not compilation units. Watchout the vocabulary ;-)
Hm, there is no syntactical categorie program_unit. There is
RM 10.1.1(2) compilation ::= {compilation_unit}
and GNAT in *standard mode* requires one compilation_unit per file (as does APEX).
However, if you write e.g.
gnatmake some_unit.ads,
what really happens is that some_unit is the given compilation_unit, but GNAT (and for that matter any modern compiler) will make a compilation of all compilation_units needed to compile the given unit. This compilation will then generally comprise many files.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-25 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-23 17:50 Stackoverflow answer in need of update? G.B.
2015-02-23 21:04 ` Simon Wright
2015-02-23 21:10 ` Simon Wright
2015-02-24 12:21 ` G.B.
2015-02-24 17:55 ` Florian Weimer
2015-02-24 18:30 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-02-25 13:14 ` AdaMagica [this message]
2015-02-25 14:02 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-02-27 10:28 ` AdaMagica
2015-02-27 11:00 ` J-P. Rosen
2015-02-27 13:53 ` AdaMagica
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox