From: charlet@adacore.com
Subject: Re: yes another gnat bug (inherited tagged type as record field is too much for gnat??)
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2019 04:12:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2019-12-10T04:12:04-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5ea6d000-7e6a-44b0-b988-b36fc157de83@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5644d8ca-4841-447d-ab61-49b71b4b1094@googlegroups.com>
> > 3) we can then accurately calculate the time that it empirically can take for a fix to defect to actually get released to the wild in FSF GNAT.
>
> You also need to take into account GCC's release constraints, see above.
>
> Arno
Actually I mixed stage 3 and 4, so never mind the above in this case: we're in stage 3 which is general bug fixes and we'll do a merge of our changes soon :-)
stage 4
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-10 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-22 13:26 yes another gnat bug (inherited tagged type as record field is too much for gnat??) gerrshapovalov
2019-11-22 13:33 ` gerrshapovalov
2019-11-22 13:39 ` Simon Wright
2019-11-22 13:57 ` gerrshapovalov
2019-11-25 19:31 ` gerrshapovalov
2019-11-25 20:01 ` Per Sandberg
2019-11-26 13:49 ` gerrshapovalov
2019-11-26 16:09 ` joakimds
2019-11-26 17:09 ` gerrshapovalov
2019-11-26 18:01 ` Simon Wright
2019-12-02 9:02 ` George Shapovalov
2019-12-02 10:02 ` joakimds
2019-12-02 17:12 ` Optikos
2019-12-02 17:50 ` AdaMagica
2019-12-02 19:51 ` George Shapovalov
2019-12-02 20:18 ` Simon Wright
2019-12-02 21:02 ` Optikos
2019-12-09 13:44 ` charlet
2019-12-10 12:12 ` charlet [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox