comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dennison@zippy.cc.ukans.edu (Ted Dennison)
Subject: Efficiency of gaurds
Date: 1997/02/12
Date: 1997-02-12T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5dr7g6$o4j$1@news.iag.net> (raw)


This question came up in my class:

My professor claims that guarding select alternatives which won't ever
contain a rendezvous (in that iteration of the select) is more efficient
than just leaving them open. He said that that way the tasking executive
won't have to check that paticular rendezvous. I'm not sure I bought this
logic. It seems to me that there could be some implementations where it
would actually be less efficient to do this, and it adds complexity to the
user program. (Which means errors).

Anyway, I'd like to ask folks who have actually *written* tasking
executives if my prof speaks the truth here.

T.E.D.




             reply	other threads:[~1997-02-12  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1997-02-12  0:00 Ted Dennison [this message]
     [not found] ` <01bc19d6$504842e0$fc00af88@godiva>
1997-02-25  0:00   ` Efficiency of gaurds Robert Dewar
1997-02-26  0:00     ` Samuel Mize
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox