From: 402450@cepsz.unizar.es (Jano)
Subject: Re: Re; [OT] Best way to isolate a GUI?
Date: 18 Feb 2003 08:29:00 -0800
Date: 2003-02-18T16:29:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5d6fdb61.0302180829.216f882@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.15.1045565811.9948.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org
Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com wrote in message news:<mailman.15.1045565811.9948.comp.lang.ada@ada.eu.org>...
> | -----Message d'origine-----
> | De: Lionel.DRAGHI@fr.thalesgroup.com
> ...
> | IMHO, the design with AWS is not comparable to the one with a
> | classical GUI
> | : there is no big added value to separate AWS from the main
> | program. The GUI
> | is allready separated, it's your browser.
> it's _for example_ your browser.
Whereas you have a point, I had thought of that. The point of
separating AWS from the main program is that
1) It really doesn't perform core functionality
2) I need not to develop a definite implementation of the GUI, web
oriented.
I have seen the SOAP module in AWS and I like that approach. Is nearly
equal to my first idea, only that it's standardized. It leaves open
any languaje for the GUI and it's completely isolated. Mmm, anyone
using SOAP for similar purposes?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-18 16:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-18 10:57 Re; [OT] Best way to isolate a GUI? Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-02-18 16:29 ` Jano [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-02-18 18:24 Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-02-18 19:52 ` Jano
2003-02-18 10:26 Lionel.DRAGHI
2003-02-16 10:19 Jano
2003-02-17 0:57 ` Re; " tmoran
2003-02-17 7:25 ` Jano
2003-02-17 14:09 ` Bobby D. Bryant
2003-02-17 21:12 ` Jano
2003-02-18 7:24 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox