From: "Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Attribute denoting a subprogram : no named parameter associations allowed
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-10-27T16:47:21-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bc23b42-3a87-463b-b7c8-ab1b426c5191@d10g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7073f784-e47f-4eea-9738-8ecec7648798@r24g2000prf.googlegroups.com
On 27 oct, 23:36, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> None of this matters, in any case, except to pedants.
>
> -- Adam
I'm aware this question in the context of attributes has something
anecdotal, but this is just I like to use named association as soon as
there is at least two parameters in a call. So it happens a moment I
asked to my self “ why isn't it possible with attributes ” ?
About the weight of this matter, this is anecdotal, that's true
(pedant is a lot said, think this is about named association, which
are useful).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-10-27 23:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-10-25 6:27 Attribute denoting a subprogram : no named parameter associations allowed Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-10-27 21:00 ` Randy Brukardt
2009-10-27 22:36 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-10-27 23:47 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne) [this message]
2009-10-28 19:03 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox