From: pontius@btv.ibm.com (Dale Pontius)
Subject: Re: What good is Ada ???
Date: 1997/01/10
Date: 1997-01-10T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5b5f0c$18t2@mdnews.btv.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 32D067C8.3920@etsu-tn.edu
In article <E3pqFr.7zC@thomsoft.com>,
kst@aonix.com (Keith Thompson) writes:
> In <19970107014700.UAA14671@ladder01.news.aol.com> wolfmtnrch@aol.com (WolfMtnRch) writes:
> [...]
>> And if that's
>> not good enough, I know of one Ada95 vender whose compiler will generate
>> Java.
>
> To be precise, it generates Java bytecode, not Java.
>
> It's unfortunate that the high level language Java and the low level
> (typically interpreted) byte code to which it is typically compiled are
> referred to by the same name. There's no necessary relationship between
> the two.
There is a dialog of Rexx called NetRexx that compiles to Java
bytecodes. Just another existance supporting your point.
Dale Pontius
(NOT speaking for IBM)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1997-01-10 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1997-01-04 0:00 What good is Ada ??? Ah Chong
1997-01-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1997-01-08 0:00 ` Mike Paley
1997-01-04 0:00 ` Why Ada for learning Data Structures (was: What good is Ada ???) Larry Kilgallen
1997-01-04 0:00 ` James Farr
1997-01-04 0:00 ` Robert S. White
1997-01-04 0:00 ` What good is Ada ??? john babrick
1997-01-05 0:00 ` Eric B. Lemings
1997-01-07 0:00 ` WolfMtnRch
1997-01-07 0:00 ` Michael Feldman
1997-01-08 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
1997-01-08 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
1997-01-10 0:00 ` Dale Pontius [this message]
1997-01-13 0:00 ` James O'Connor
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Brett M. Kettering
1997-01-08 0:00 ` Mike Paley
1997-01-06 0:00 ` Daniel P Hudson
1997-01-07 0:00 ` Jon S Anthony
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox