From: sbelmont700@gmail.com
Subject: Re: We should introduce aliased types
Date: Fri, 1 Aug 2014 13:39:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2014-08-01T13:39:01-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5aa0a458-fa4a-479d-b51f-b8658dc0d11f@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lrgnoc$di6$1@speranza.aioe.org>
On Friday, August 1, 2014 2:54:06 PM UTC-4, Victor Porton wrote:
> I think we should introduce aliased types to allow self-referencing objects
>
> and objects which we can access for object's internal purposes:
>
I would rather see "not aliased" subprogram parameters (and I guess also return values) to help do fun things with constructor functions. At the very least it would make smart pointers safer, but I have lots of other dreams about limited types (though it would probably be too complex to really work).
-sb
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-01 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-01 18:54 We should introduce aliased types Victor Porton
2014-08-01 18:56 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-01 19:16 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-01 19:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-08-01 19:57 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-01 19:44 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-08-01 19:49 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-08-01 20:39 ` sbelmont700 [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox