From: Ze Administrator <groleau+news@freeshell.org>
Subject: Re: Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes
Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 23:10:44 -0500
Date: 2004-01-08T23:10:44-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a6dnSDERdpetGOi4p2dnA@gbronline.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4682ab7.0401081728.37b52620@posting.google.com>
Adam Beneschan wrote:
> No, I'm not. If there are a dozen named access-to-integer types
> directly visible at that point (which would mean that their "="
> operators are also visible), the RM rules clearly say that "=" would
> be ambiguous. I think I briefly touched on that situation in my
> original post. The question is, what should happen when only one such
> "=" operator is a possibility.
Every construct that implies a type without naming it
effectively declares an anonymous type, right? Can any
two constructs 'declare' the same anonymous type?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-01-09 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-08 2:05 Language lawyer question: Equality on 'Access attributes Adam Beneschan
2004-01-08 7:47 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-01-08 11:07 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-01-08 17:18 ` Adam Beneschan
2004-01-08 18:04 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-08 18:31 ` Ze Administrator
2004-01-08 21:04 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-09 4:02 ` Ze Administrator
2004-01-09 23:02 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-10 2:56 ` Ze Administrator
2004-01-09 4:06 ` Ze Administrator
2004-01-09 23:05 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-10 3:03 ` Ze Administrator
2004-01-10 13:47 ` Marin David Condic
2004-01-10 7:19 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-01-10 19:09 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-11 14:27 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-01-11 21:42 ` Ze Administrator
2004-01-12 5:16 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-01-09 1:28 ` Adam Beneschan
2004-01-09 4:10 ` Ze Administrator [this message]
2004-01-09 11:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-01-09 23:09 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-10 11:56 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2004-01-10 17:08 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-01-10 18:40 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-09 23:08 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-10 7:39 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-01-08 20:36 ` tmoran
2004-01-08 21:06 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-09 0:27 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-01-09 1:23 ` Adam Beneschan
2004-01-09 1:38 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-09 6:16 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-01-09 23:27 ` Randy Brukardt
2004-01-10 16:37 ` Robert I. Eachus
[not found] ` <hmfvc1-f73.ln1@beastie.ix.netcom.com>
[not found] ` <l7v1d1-n33.ln1@beastie.ix.netcom.com>
2004-01-09 23:19 ` Robert A Duff
2004-01-09 23:21 ` Randy Brukardt
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-01-09 5:48 christoph.grein
2004-01-09 6:03 christoph.grein
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox