From: anh_vo@udlp.com (Anh_Vo)
Subject: Re: Visibility of private packages??
Date: 31 Jul 2002 10:43:15 -0700
Date: 2002-07-31T17:43:15+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5a59d6a9.0207310943.6d043680@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: DtD19.636$C8.2739@nnrp1.uunet.ca
Just change private package A.B1.C1 to private package A.B3. A.B2 body
can with A.B3 package. Thus, the desired effect is achieved.
"Peter Coventry" <Peter.Coventry@gdcanada.com> wrote in message news:<DtD19.636$C8.2739@nnrp1.uunet.ca>...
> ...
> Does this mean that if A.B1.C1 is private, it can only be withed by the
> bodies of A.B1 and other descendants of A.B1, and specs of private packages
> of descendants of A.B1?
>
> If this is the case, how could I structure things to give the desired
> effect?
>
> Thanks.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-31 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-30 21:23 Visibility of private packages?? Peter Coventry
2002-07-31 9:13 ` John McCabe
2002-07-31 12:06 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-07-31 13:30 ` Robert A Duff
2002-08-14 1:16 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-08-14 9:53 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-08-14 17:03 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-14 19:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-07-31 11:55 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2002-07-31 13:22 ` Mark Doherty
2002-07-31 17:43 ` Anh_Vo [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox