From: "Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.not.jrcarter@acm.not.spam.org>
Subject: Re: lexical ambiguity
Date: Fri, 09 Jun 2006 04:41:37 GMT
Date: 2006-06-09T04:41:37+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5_6ig.23498$1i1.2181@attbi_s72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <euirncvq7y.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de>
M E Leypold wrote:
>
> But now things become rather ad-hoc. Well -- as I said, that it's just
> curiosity driving me, so I'm not going now to examine the RM not I'm
> going to reverse engineer GNAT to find out how it is done in reality.
You don't need to reverse engineer it. The sources are freely available.
--
Jeff Carter
"Run away! Run away!"
Monty Python and the Holy Grail
58
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-09 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-02 22:13 lexical ambiguity bla_bla1357
2006-06-02 22:35 ` Frank J. Lhota
2006-06-03 5:20 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-06-04 17:33 ` Frank J. Lhota
2006-06-05 1:36 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-06-05 18:30 ` Frank J. Lhota
2006-06-05 20:27 ` Keith Thompson
2006-06-05 22:11 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-06-06 10:39 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-06 11:38 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-07 9:02 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-06-07 13:15 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-07 14:49 ` Robert A Duff
2006-06-07 17:18 ` M E Leypold
2006-06-08 21:30 ` Robert A Duff
2006-06-09 4:41 ` Jeffrey R. Carter [this message]
2006-06-09 8:23 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-06 13:50 ` Simon Clubley
2006-06-06 18:56 ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-06-06 19:41 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-06-05 22:16 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-06-06 13:20 ` Frank J. Lhota
2006-06-02 23:27 ` Keith Thompson
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox