From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: Tasks unleashed
Date: Fri, 02 May 2003 01:14:41 GMT
Date: 2003-05-02T01:14:41+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5Ejsa.430589$OV.427578@rwcrnsc54> (raw)
In-Reply-To: MPG.191b473be18428019896f1@News.CIS.DFN.DE
>In any case, the memory thing forces to use pools of reusable tasks,
>it's my main and crucial conclusion.
Have you considered a protected Buffer of work to do and a fixed pool of
tasks which queue on an entry waiting for the Buffer to have some work to
do (or instructions to quit)? Then you needn't create or destroy the
worker tasks.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-05-02 1:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-05-01 14:01 Tasks unleashed Jano
2003-05-01 15:40 ` Stephen Leake
2003-05-01 16:14 ` Robert A Duff
2003-05-01 16:30 ` Jano
2003-05-02 1:14 ` tmoran [this message]
2003-05-02 11:21 ` Jano
2003-05-02 23:52 ` tmoran
2003-05-11 5:35 ` Craig Carey
2003-05-11 15:35 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox