From: Isaac Gouy <igouy2@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: is having a complex type as built-in the languages vs. being in standard package makes performance difference?
Date: Wed, 16 May 2012 18:48:15 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-05-16T18:48:15-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <59a93603-717d-47b6-8993-099dfb2a1f49@t2g2000pbg.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1099588589358896339.853580rmhost.bauhaus-maps.arcor.de@news.arcor.de
On May 16, 2:33 pm, georg bauhaus <rmhost.bauh...@maps.arcor.de>
wrote:
> Jerry <lancebo...@qwest.net> wrote:
>
> >>http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/u64/program.php?test=mandelbrot&lan......
>
> > The third of these has no table of results.
> > Jerry
>
> They do not always measure all programs ever submitted, in this case you
> might need to run the compiler yourself ;-)
"They" did (back in July 2009) but as faster programs become
available, slower programs are removed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 1:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-16 18:25 is having a complex type as built-in the languages vs. being in standard package makes performance difference? Nasser M. Abbasi
2012-05-16 19:23 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-05-16 21:08 ` Jerry
2012-05-16 21:33 ` georg bauhaus
2012-05-17 1:48 ` Isaac Gouy [this message]
2012-05-16 19:26 ` gautier_niouzes
2012-05-17 0:19 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox