From: tmoran@acm.org
Subject: Re: Minimum Record Size? LONG
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 21:54:09 GMT
Date: 2003-04-25T21:54:09+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <58iqa.618323$3D1.338486@sccrnsc01> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3EA97222.35376FF7@raytheon.com
>This may also be a big / little endian problem.
As becomes apparent if you try to write a layout rep spec for
>> type Four_Group is record
>> Part1, Part2, Part3, Part4 : Six_Bits;
>> end record;
>> for Four_Group'Size use 24;
for Four_Group use record
Part1 at 0 range ...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-04-25 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-04-25 16:33 Minimum Record Size? LONG Dr Nancy's Sweetie
2003-04-25 17:35 ` Stephen Leake
2003-04-25 17:36 ` Mark Johnson
2003-04-25 21:54 ` tmoran [this message]
2003-04-25 18:51 ` David C. Hoos
2003-04-25 21:51 ` tmoran
2003-04-26 3:00 ` David C. Hoos
2003-04-26 2:12 ` Steve
2003-04-27 1:57 ` Rick Stikkers
2003-04-27 12:06 ` David C. Hoos
2003-04-27 14:17 ` Steve
2003-04-27 20:25 ` David C. Hoos
2003-04-28 5:04 ` Steve
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox